JOHN BRYANT, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1994-08-24
No. 94-01817
FRANK, C.J., and RYDER and DANAHY, JJ., concur.
641 So. 2d 192 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1994) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

John Bryant appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief.

We reverse.

He alleges that he was denied effective assistance of counsel in that counsel: 1) forced him to testify at trial; 2) never investigated his alibi witness; 3) failed to object to the fact that no black juror was seated on the jury; and 4) did not object to lack of notice by the state of its intention to treat him as a habitual offender.

The trial court set forth its reasons for denying relief, but failed to attach portions of the record that refute appellant’s allegations.

Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order. On remand, if the court again denies relief, it must attach portions of its records that refute the appellant’s allegations. If the appellant is aggrieved by any subsequent action of the trial court, he must file a timely notice of appeal to obtain further appellate review.

Reversed and remanded.

FRANK, C.J., and RYDER and DANAHY, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Bryant v. State, 661 So. 2d 73 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)
    …sel coerced appellant. into testifying in circuit court case number 90-1387. In our prior review of this case, we remanded because the trial court denied relief without attaching portions of the record refuting appellant’s claims. Bryant v. State, 641 So. 2d 192 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). Attached to the second order denying relief are portions of the trial transcript, discovery documents, certificates of service, and responses to the mandate filed by defense counsel and the state. These documents do not, however,…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw