JOSEPH CARRERA, APPELLANT,
v.
LINDA CARRERA, N/K/A LINDA CERESA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a judgment establishing the amount of past due child support owed by appellant to appellee. We find no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s denial of a continuance. The trial court apparently concluded that the appellant was substantially at fault for the difficulties with his counsel. In addition, the appellant has failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice. We find no other reversible error and affirm the trial court’s judgment except that we remand with direction that the judgment be reduced by $1,300. It appears undisputed in the record that the portion of an orthodontist’s bill properly charged to appellant should be $1,200 and not the $2,500 found by the trial court.
ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and STONE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Williams v. State, 658 So. 2d 665 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)…v. State, 20 Fla.L.Weekly S186 (Fla. April 27, 1995); State v. Kahles, 644 So. 2d 512 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994), approved, 657 So. 2d 897 (Fla.1995); Blount v. State, 641 So. 2d 200 (Fla. 4th DCA), approved, 654 So. 2d 126 (Fla.1995); Kostenski v. State, 641 So. 2d 199 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). PARIENTE and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.…
-
Saiya v. State, 641 So. 2d 975 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See State v. Kahles, No. 93-0957, 1994 WL 457135 (Fla. 4th DCA August 24, 1994); Blount v. State, 641 So. 2d 200 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Kostenski v. State, 641 So. 2d 199 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Pallas v. State, 636 So. 2d 1358 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Bouters v. State, 634 So. 2d 246 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994), review granted, No. 83,558, 640 So. 2d 1106 (Fla. June 21, 1994). WARNER, POLEN and FARMER, JJ., concur.…