RAY PULLES, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
RAY PULLES, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
641 So. 2d 521
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1994)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The order denying the motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) is affirmed. Although the State concedes a 15-point error on the guidelines scoresheet, appellant is entitled to no relief because the correction would not change his guidelines range. See Orsi v. State, 515 So. 2d 268 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). We do not reach appellant’s argument (raised for the first time on appeal) that there is error in the scoring of his prior record because that argument was not presented to the trial court.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Hernandez, 658 So. 2d 620 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)…ity, either as an officer or as a private citizen, to effectuate an out-of-territorial jurisdiction stop and frisk in Florida. Since these arguments were never raised below, they will not be entertained for the first time on appeal. Pulles v. State, 641 So. 2d 521 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Montanez v. State, 630 So. 2d 1163 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993), rev. denied, 639 So. 2d 979 (Fla.1994); Mapp v. State, 613 So. 2d 100 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993).…
Authorities Cited
- Dep't of Hwy. Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Roberts, 515 So. 2d 268 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987)
- Orsi v. State, 515 So. 2d 268 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987)