LASZLO MADARI, APPELLANT,

v.

GABOR N. BOZSOKY AND THE FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

• Taylor v. Vill. OF N. Palm Beach, 659 So. 2d 1167 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)
  …termination requires at least one meaningful application. Glisson, 558 So. 2d at 1035. As we recently noted, “[r]ipeness requires a firm delineation of permitted uses so that the extent of the taking can be analyzed.” Tinnerman v. Palm Beach County, 641 So. 2d 523, 526 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). The trial court properly recognized that the requirement of ripeness enhances the potential for an administrative or political resolution of a dispute, without the need for intervention by a court and additionally assists…
• Lost Tree Vill. Corp. v. City OF Vero Beach & the Town of Indian River Shores, 838 So. 2d 561 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)
  …lan for the last decade and should not be required to apply to remove it now. As for any claim that it would be futile to apply to develop the Outer Islands, either within the City or Town, such a claim must fail. In Tinnerman v. Palm Beach County, 641 So. 2d 523 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994), this court held that “[futility is not established until at least one meaningful application has been filed.” 641 [*575] So. 2d 523, 526. Because Lost Tree has not even formulated a proposed plan to develop the Outer Islands to…
• City OF Riviera Beach v. Shillingburg, 659 So. 2d 1174 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)
  …(1985); Eide v. Sarasota County, 908 F. 2d 716, 720-21 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1120, 111 S.Ct. 1073, 112 L.Ed.2d 1179 (1991). Florida courts have likewise adopted the ripeness requirement. See Taylor; Tinnerman v. Palm Beach County, 641 So. 2d 523, 526 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); City of Jacksonville v. Wynn, 650 So. 2d 182 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Glisson v. Alachua County, 558 So. 2d 1030, 1034 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 570 So. 2d 1304 (Fla.1990). In our recent opinion in Taylor and in Tinnerman…