WORLD TRANSPORTATION, INC., PETITIONER,
v.
CENTRAL FLORIDA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION, ETC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the hearing officer's statements objectively demonstrated bias and prejudice, requiring her disqualification.
[1] A hearing officer's statements can objectively demonstrate bias and prejudice, establishing just cause for disqualification.
[2] A hearing officer's attempt to refute charges of partiality can constitute additional grounds for disqualification.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligencePetitioner sought disqualification of a hearing officer for bias in an administrative proceeding concerning a federally funded bus service that would …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Bias And Prejudice cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, World Transportation, Inc., seeks review of the order entered by a hearing officer, Frankee Hellinger, refusing to disqualify herself from presiding over a formal administrative proceeding before the Central Florida Regional Transportation Authority and the Orange-Seminole-Osceola Transportation Authority. See § 120.68(1),, Fla.Stat. (1993); Fla.R.App.P. 9.030(b)(2)(A) and 9.100(c). World Transportation, Inc. was granted a formal hearing before the two boards pursuant to Chapter 120, Florida Statutes, and Hellinger, a member of both boards, was authorized to conduct the hearing. Both boards have approved a federally funded bus service in Orlando, which World Transportation, Inc. claims will adversely impact its business operations. Among the issues to be considered at the hearing are the alleged misuse of federal funds, failure to give notice to affected transportation companies and denying them an opportunity to participate in the planning process, unconstitutional use of public funds for private benefit, and the implementation of a competing publicly-funded bus service tantamount to a taking of petitioner’s business.
We think petitioner carried its burden of establishing just cause that Hellinger should be disqualified from serving as the hearing officer in this proceeding because of various statements she made, which objectively demonstrate bias and prejudice against World Transportation. § 120.71, Fla.Stat. (1993). She also attempted to refute the charge of partiality, which constitutes additional grounds for disqualification. Cf. R.P. Hewitt & Associates v. Hurt, 411 So. 2d 266 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).
In view of the adverse posture of the petitioner and the two agencies involved, we strongly recommend that the agencies request an independent hearing officer from the Division of Administrative Hearings. See generally § 120.65, Fla.Stat. (1993). In any event, selection of another board member would not be appropriate.
Petition GRANTED; Order QUASHED; REMANDED.
W. SHARP, GOSHORN and PETERSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Parmley v. Fla. Dep't of Child. & Families, 254 So. 3d 594 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018)
-
Jones v. Fla. Keys Cmty. Coll., 984 So. 2d 556 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)…the hearing officer. As the Fifth District said in a similar case, “we strongly recommend that the agencfy] request an independent hearing officer from [*558] the Division of Administrative Hearings.” World Transp., Inc. v. Cent. Fla. Reg’l Transp., 641 So. 2d 913, 914 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). The Community College relies on such cases as Bay Bank & Trust Co. v. Lewis, 634 So. 2d 672 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994), Lash, Inc. v. Department of Business Regulation, 411 So. 2d 276 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), and Meyer v. Department o…
Authorities Cited
- R. P. Hewitt & Assocs. v. The Honorable Charles C. Hurt, 411 So. 2d 266 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)