JOHN PRIMM, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1994-08-17
No. 94-1249
GLICKSTEIN, POLEN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
641 So. 2d 930 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1994) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We find appellant’s Notice of Appeal to be timely filed pursuant to Haag v. State, 591 So. 2d 614 (Fla.1992).

Having considered appellant’s brief and the record, we find no error in the trial court’s denial of appellant’s criminal rule 3.850 motion without evidentiary hearing.

AFFIRMED.

GLICKSTEIN, POLEN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Freeman v. State, 644 So. 2d 356 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)
    …nishment. Recently, this court determined that a written sentencing order which included a provision preventing participation in work release did not conform to the orally pronounced sentence, and that provision had to be deleted. Davidson v. State, 641 So. 2d 930 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). Accordingly, the order under review is reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with Davidson. ERVIN, JOANOS and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw