FRED G. WRIGHT, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, D/B/A WRIGHT CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
DENNIS EDWARDS, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A general contractor is immune from suit for employee injuries if a subcontractor provides workers' compensation coverage, unless the employee can prove an intentional tort.
[1] A general contractor is immune from suit for simple negligence when a subcontractor provides workers' compensation benefits to its injured employee.
[2] Workers' compensation benefits are the exclusive remedy for an employee injured during the course of employment, barring actions for simple negligence against the employe…
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAn employee was injured on the job and received workers' compensation benefits from his employer, a subcontractor. The employee then sued the general …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Intentional Tort Exception To Workers' Compensation Immunity cases and more on FLexlaw
PATTERSON, Judge.
Fred G. Wright, Inc., d/b/a Wright Construction Corporation (Wright), appeals from the trial court’s order denying its motion for summary judgment. Wright argues that it is immune from suit because of the workers’ compensation immunity provided to a general contractor pursuant to sections 440.10 and 440.11, Florida Statutes (1987). We agree and reverse.
CMC Development Corporation hired Wright to act as the general contractor for the construction of a building. Wright subcontracted the erection of the structural steel portion of the building to Suncoast Steel & Pipe. In turn, Suncoast Steel & Pipe subcontracted a portion of its work to Suncoast Fabricators, Inc. The appellee, Dennis Edwards, worked for Suncoast Fabricators. On September 20, 1988, while on the job, Edwards was riding on a steel beam being hoisted by a crane when the beam became loose or tilted. Edwards fell to the ground, sustaining serious injuries.
Edwards filed a workers’ compensation claim against his employer, Suncoast Fabricators, and received full workers’ compensation benefits for his injuries and damages. He later filed an action against Wright, Suncoast Steel & Pipe, Suncoast Fabricators, and various other managerial and supervisory personnel under intentional tort and gross negligence theories. The defendants filed motions for summary judgment, alleging that they were entitled to immunity from suit under sections 440.10 and 440.11, Florida Statutes (1987),1 since Edwards re- ceived workers’ compensation benefits through Suncoast Fabricator’s insurance policy. The trial court granted summary judgment as to all defendants except Wright. This was error. Whenever disability or death results from an injury obtained during the course of employment, compensation under the Florida' Workers’ Compensation Act is the injured employee’s exclusive remedy. § 440.11(1), Fla.Stat. (1987). Section 440.11(1) grants immunity from suit to all employers and their employees, acting in the scope of employment, for simple negligence. Employees who act with “willful and wanton disregard” or with gross negligence toward a fellow employee are not immune from suit. § 440.-11(1), Fla.Stat. (1987).
If a subcontractor provides workers’ compensation benefits to its injured employee, workers’ compensation immunity would not only apply to the subcontractor, but to the general contractor as well. § 440.11(1)(b), Fla.Stat. (1987); Dodge v. William E. Arnold Co., 373 So. 2d 98 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). Since Edwards’ employer, Suncoast Fabricators, had workers’ compensation coverage, Wright, as general contractor, was a statutory employer pursuant to section 440.10 entitled to the same immunity as Suncoast Fabricators. See Powell v. Independent Constr. Co., 396 So. 2d 725 (Fla. 5th DCA), review denied, 402 So. 2d 612 (Fla.1981).
To overcome a statutory employer’s workers’ compensation immunity, the employee must be able to show that the employer committed an intentional tort. Fisher v. Shenandoah Gen. Constr. Co., 498 So. 2d 882 (Fla.1986); Lawton v. Alpine Engineered Prods., Inc., 498 So. 2d 879 (Fla.1986). “In order for an employer’s actions to amount to an intentional tort, the employer must either exhibit a deliberate intent to injure or engage in conduct which is substantially certain to result in injury or death.” Fisher, 498 So. 2d at 883; Spivey v. Battaglia, 258 Solid 815 (Fla.1972). The factual allegations in the fourth amended complaint and the record evidence regarding Wright’s or its employees’ involvement in the accident do not rise to the level of an intentional tort or gross negligence. Therefore, the trial court erred in failing to grant Wright’s motion for summary judgment.
Accordingly, we reverse the order denying Wright’s amended motion for summary final judgment.
DANAHY, A.C.J., and QUINCE, J., concur. . Section 440.10(1) states in part:
In case a contractor sublets any part or parts of his contract work to a subcontractor or subcontractors, all of the employees of such contractor and subcontractor or subcontractors engaged on such contract work shall be deemed to be employed in one and the same business or establishment; and the contractor shall be liable for, and shall secure, the payment of compensation to all such employees, except to employees of a subcontractor who has secured such payment.
Section 440.11 states in part:
(1) The liability of an employer prescribed in s. 440.10 shall be exclusive and in place of all other liability of such employer to any third-party tortfeasor and to the employee, the legal representative thereof, husband or wife, parents, dependents, next of kin, and anyone otherwise entitled to recover damages from such employer at law or in admiralty on account of such injury or death, except that if an employer fails to secure payment of compensation as required by this chapter, an injured employee, or the legal representative thereof in case death results from the injury, may elect to claim compensation under this chapter or to maintain an action at law or in admiralty for damages on account of such injury or death.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Austin v. The Duval Cnty. Sch. Bd., 657 So. 2d 945 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)…es both the duty to obtain compensation benefits and the concomitant immunity from claims based on negligence. See Employers Insurance of Wausau v. Abernathy, 442 So. 2d 953, 954 (Fla.1983); Smith, 576 So. 2d at 817; Fred G. Wright, Inc. v. Edwards, 642 So. 2d 808 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). The three-part test for an employment relationship is: (1) whether there is a contract of hire, express or implied, between an employee and the special employer; (2) whether the work being done at the time of the injury is essen…
-
Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. & Norma J. Peele v. Steadman, 895 So. 2d 434 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)…n conduct that was “substantially certain” to result in injury to the employee. Id. See also Sierra v. Associated Marine Insts., Inc., 850 So. 2d 582, 587 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), review denied, 869 So. 2d 538 (Fla.2004); Fred G. Wright, Inc. v. Edwards, 642 So. 2d 808, 809 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Allstates Fireproofing, Inc. v. Garcia, 876 So. 2d 1222, 1224 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). Here, Ms. Steadman filed a complaint for intentional infliction of emotional distress against her employer’s workers’ compensation carrier.…
-
Worthington Cmtys., Inc. v. Mejia, 28 So. 3d 79 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)…tractual duties in a negligent manner, if he had been employed by a separate general contracting corporation, would not have been the type of action that would have overcome workers’ compensation immunity. See, e.g., Fred G. Wright, Inc. v. Edwards, 642 So. 2d 808, 809 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994) (holding general contractor was a statutory employer of sub-subcontractor’s employee and therefore entitled to same immunity under workers’ compensation law as sub-subcontractor which purchased workers’ compensation). Thus,…
Authorities Cited
- Fisher v. Shenandoah Gen. Constr. Co., 498 So. 2d 882 (Fla. 1986)
- Lawton v. Alpine Engineered Prods., Inc., 498 So. 2d 879 (Fla. 1986)
- Dodge v. William E. Arnold Co. & Fid. & Cas. Co. of N.Y., 373 So. 2d 98 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)
- Powell v. Indep. Constr. Co., 396 So. 2d 725 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981)