ERSKINE BEACHAM, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ERSKINE BEACHAM, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
642 So. 2d 852
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1994)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See State v. Skofstad, 498 So. 2d 582 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986), rev. denied, 506 So. 2d 1043 (Fla.1987); State v. Nobles, 477 So. 2d 32 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), dismissed, 492 So. 2d 1334 (Fla.1986). See also P.L.R. v. State, 455 So. 2d 363 (Fla.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1220, 105 S.Ct. 1206, 84 L.Ed.2d 349 (1985); Stanley v. State, 559 So. 2d 460 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).
HERSEY, STONE and KLEIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- P.L.R. v. State, 455 So. 2d 363 (Fla. 1984)
- Bellman v. United States, 469 U.S. 1220 (U.S. 1985)
- P. L. R. v. Florida, 469 U.S. 1220 (U.S. 1985)
- State v. Nobles, 477 So. 2d 32 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)
- The Billburg Corp. v. Acct. Grp., Inc., 559 So. 2d 460 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990)
- Stanley v. State, 559 So. 2d 460 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990)
- State v. Skofstad, 498 So. 2d 582 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)