MARTIN FLETCHER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Martin Fletcher appealed his conviction for attempted first degree murder of a law enforcement officer. The Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, reversed his conviction on the attempted murder charge because he was entitled to a jury instruction on the lesser included offense of aggravated assault, but affirmed his convictions on all other counts.
Yes, the defendant was entitled to a jury instruction on aggravated assault as a lesser included offense because there was evidence upon which a jury could find that Deputy Stuhr was put in fear when the gun was pointed at him, regardless of what was alleged in the charging documents.
[1] A defendant is entitled to a jury instruction on a permissive lesser included offense if the evidence supports such an instruction, regardless of the allegations in the c…
[2] Evidence that a defendant pointed a gun at a law enforcement officer may support a jury finding that the officer was put in fear, entitling the defendant to a lesser incl…
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“a defendant is entitled to requested instructions on all lesser degree crimes which are supported by the evidence, regardless of the allegations in the charging documents”
Establishes the legal standard that jury instructions on lesser included offenses must be given if supported by evidence, not based on charging document language.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceFletcher pointed a gun at Deputy Sheriff Stuhr during an arrest on an outstanding warrant, after first pointing the gun at another deputy. Stuhr knock…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Attempted First Degree Murder cases and more on FLexlaw
PARIENTE, Judge.
The defendant appeals his conviction on multiple counts. Count II charged the defendant with attempted first degree murder on a law enforcement officer with a firearm. We reverse the defendant’s conviction on this count because we find that the defendant was entitled to a jury instruction on the permissible lesser included offense of aggravated assault. We affirm the defendant’s conviction on all other counts.
This criminal event occurred in the course of arresting the defendant on an outstanding warrant. As to count II, the state established that the defendant pointed a gun at Deputy Sheriff Stuhr after first pointing the gun at another deputy. Deputy Stuhr then knocked the gun from the defendant’s hand and the defendant subsequently attempted to deprive the deputy of his weapon by trying to remove it from his hands. The defendant requested a jury instruction on the charge of aggravated assault. The state does not dispute that aggravated assault is a permissive lesser included offense of attempted first degree murder, but argues that neither the information nor the evidence established that Deputy Stuhr was put in fear when the defendant pointed the gun at him. In reliance on State v. Von Deck, 607 So. 2d 1388 (Fla.1992), both the state and the defendant direct us to the wording of the information to discern whether the elements of aggravated assault were adequately alleged. However, a defendant is entitled to requested instructions on all lesser degree crimes which are supported by the evidence, regardless of the allegations in the charging documents. See Herrington v. State, 538 So. 2d 850 (Fla.1989). Therefore, the parties’ discussion about the wording of the information is not relevant to our inquiry because we are reviewing the refusal to give the defendant’s requested instruction and not the refusal to charge on a lesser included offense requested by the state as in Von Deck.
Based on the evidence presented to the jury, the defendant was entitled to an instruction on aggravated assault as there was evidence upon which a jury could find that Deputy Stuhr was put in fear when the gun was pointed at him. Accordingly we reverse the defendant’s conviction on count II and affirm his conviction on all other counts.
As to the defendant’s argument that it was error to admit evidence of his probationary status and the outstanding felony warrants, while we do not find error, on retrial the court should consider giving a cautionary instruction as to the limited purpose for receiving this evidence.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; REMANDED.
FARMER, J., and MAY, MELANIE G., Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Higgs v. State, 801 So. 2d 269 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)…t it was error to permit a lesser instruction on assault where the information did not contain the necessary elements of the permissive lesser included offense. See Von Deck, 607 So. 2d at 1389. Appellant relies on our opinion in Fletcher v. State, 642 So. 2d 1096, 1097 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994), which on similar facts, held that it was error to refuse to give a jury instruction on aggravated assault. While we noted Von Deck, we relied on Herrington v. State, 538 So. 2d 850 (Fla.1989), a case dealing with the first…
Authorities Cited
- State v. von Deck, 607 So. 2d 1388 (Fla. 1992)
- Herrington v. State, 538 So. 2d 850 (Fla. 1989)