JAY NELSON LOCKWOOD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JAY NELSON LOCKWOOD, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
643 So. 2d 127
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1994)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The state concedes error in this case based upon the supreme court’s opinion in Karchesky v. State, 591 So. 2d 930 (Fla.1992) and this court’s opinion in Boland v. State, 613 So. 2d 72 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). Accordingly, this case is reversed and remanded with directions to the trial court to resentence Appellant using a new sentencing scoresheet.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
GUNTHER, KLEIN and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
E.K.B. v. Dep't OF Child. & Families, 724 So. 2d 720 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)…(Fla. 3d DCA 1998). We find the trial court soundly and appropriately exercised its discretion in considering the best interests of J.B., and accordingly affirm the order below. See Pet-tit v. State, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 643 So. 2d 127 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Myles v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services, 590 So. 2d at 1053. Affirmed.…
-
Viering v. Fla. Comm'n ON Human Relations, 128 So. 3d 967 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013)…to support the findings of fact in the record, the Florida courts, including this court, have consistently held that the agency may not reject them, modify them, substitute its findings, or make new findings”); Knapp v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 643 So. 2d 127, 127 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994) (“Although an agency may reject a hearing officer’s finding of fact after it has read the entire record, the record must disclose the complete absence of evidence to support the factual finding.”). “The agency may not reject…
Authorities Cited
- Karchesky v. State, 591 So. 2d 930 (Fla. 1992)
- Boland v. State, 613 So. 2d 72 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)