RUBIN KIDD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
RUBIN KIDD, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
643 So. 2d 1190
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1994)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Other
PER CURIAM.
We withdraw our previous per curiam af-firmance. We affirm the trial court’s order granting Kidd’s motion for post-conviction relief, but remand with directions to the court to conform its written order to its oral pronouncement at sentencing, dismissing counts II and III of the information against Kidd.
ERVIN, JOANOS and KAHN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hechavarria-Sanchez v. State, 654 So. 2d 1071 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Davis v. State, 594 So. 2d 264, 266 (Fla.1992); Balthazar v. State, 549 So. 2d 661 (Fla.1989); Tillman v. State, 643 So. 2d 1190 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994).…
-
Lindsey v. State, 671 So. 2d 219 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)…ten sentencing form, because it fails to reflect the sentence orally pronounced as to Count III in Case No. 94-4597. Appellant’s convictions and sentences are otherwise affirmed. See Kyle v. State, 648 So. 2d 1238 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Kidd v. State, 643 So. 2d 1190 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). AFFIRMED, but REMANDED for correction of the written sentencing form. ERVIN, MINER and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.…