DAVID L. STEWART, APPELLANT,
v.
CORALIE K. DOWNING, JOANN QUIGGLE, ET AL., APPELLEES

Fla. 5th DCA | 1994-10-20
No. 94-2249
DAUKSCH, GOSHORN and PETERSON, JJ., concur.
643 So. 2d 1191 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1994) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s order Granting Preliminary and Permanent Injunction is affirmed. This court’s Order dated October 10, 1994 staying the trial court’s order is dissolved.

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH, GOSHORN and PETERSON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Hunter v. State, 651 So. 2d 1258 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)
    …4), and Rocker v. State, 640 So. 2d 163 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994), which hold that costs levied under sections 960.20, 943.25 and 27.3455 must be imposed on a per-case basis. See also Wallace v. State, 637 So. 2d 385 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Spruill v. State, 643 So. 2d 1191 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). The state replies that this court should not follow Hollingsworth because Hollings-worth’s charges, although occurring on separate days, were nevertheless charged in a single information. If we were to accept the state’s argume…
  • Brenton McNEIL v. State, 162 So. 3d 274 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015)
    …tat. (1991). Based on the “clear language” of the statute, this court held that the costs “must be imposed per case and not per count.” Rocker, 640 So. 2d at 163. Shortly after this court decided Rocker, it rendered its decision in Spruill v. State, 643 So. 2d 1191, 1193 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994), wherein this court, citing Rocker, held that “[t]he trial court also erred in imposing mandatory court costs on a per-count rather than a per-case basis.” In Hunter, the First District Court reviewed the same statute and h…
  • Taylor v. State, 949 So. 2d 345 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)
    …on must be supported by the greater weight of the evidence. See Steiner v. State, 604 So. 2d 1265, 1267 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). On appeal, the abuse of discretion standard of review applies to an order of probation revocation. Id. In Spruill v. State, 643 So. 2d 1191, 1192 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994), the fifth district upheld the trial court’s order revoking the defendant’s probation for failure to make any payments towards his monthly restitution obligation. There, the defendant was ordered to pay $1,700,000 in restit…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw