DARRYL SHAWN GUILFORD, ET AL., PETITIONERS,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 1994-10-27
No. 83500
GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.
644 So. 2d 87 Florida Supreme Court (1994)


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We review State v. Guilford, 633 So. 2d 548 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994), in which the court certified the following as a question of great public importance:

IS THE REVERSE SPLIT SENTENCE A DOWNWARD DEPARTURE FROM THE GUIDELINES WHICH REQUIRES WRITTEN JUSTIFICATIONS?

Id. at 551. We have jurisdiction under article V, section 3(b)(4) of the Florida Constitution.

We answered the identical question in the affirmative in Disbrow v. State, 642 So. 2d 740 (Fla.1994). Accordingly, we approve the decision below.

It is so ordered.

GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw