F.W.M., A CHILD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
F.W.M., A CHILD, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
644 So. 2d 135
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1994)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 20 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
F.W.M. appeals the trial court’s finding that he committed the delinquent act of aggravated battery, as well as the subsequent imposition, after adjudication of delinquency was withheld, of fifty dollars to the Crimes Compensation Trust Fund pursuant to section 960.20, Florida Statutes (Supp.1992). We affirm the trial court’s determination of delinquency. We strike, however, the cost assessment because the trial court withheld adjudication of delinquency. J.A. v. State, 633 So. 2d 108 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part.
FRANK, C.J., and PARKER and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bart L. Segall v. Segall, 708 So. 2d 983 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)…e of any imputed income, the probable and potential earnings level, and the adjustments to income, the trial court’s final judgment was deficient. See id.; accord Bimonte v. Martin-Bimonte, 679 So. 2d 18, 19 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Viscito v. Menditto, 644 So. 2d 135, 136 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Levine v. Best, 595 So. 2d 278, 279 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). Without the requisite factual determinations, this court is unable to ascertain whether the trial court’s child support award was within the guide [*989] lines or exce…
-
Artuso v. Dick, 843 So. 2d 942 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)…been depending upon an inheritance but testified she was looking for employment as an appraiser. The trial court imputed income to the mother in the amount of $1,240 per month, but did not set forth the basis for its holding. In Viscito v. Menditto, 644 So. 2d 135, 136 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994), although there was ample evidence in the record for the trial court to impute income, we still reversed and remanded for the trial court to make express findings regarding the amount and source of the income. Viscito compel…
-
Crowley v. Crowley, 678 So. 2d 435 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)…ely, the trial court’s order fails to specify in detail whether the additional $10,000 per month imputed to the husband represents the difference between his actual monthly pay from Dry Cleaning Depot and what he should be paid. Viscito v. Menditto, 644 So. 2d 135 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Jones v. Jones, 636 So. 2d 867 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Neal v. Meek, 591 So. 2d 1044 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). Without this requisite specific factual determination this court is unable to ascertain whether the income imputed was proper…1 / 2
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- J.A. v. State, 633 So. 2d 108 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994)