RADCLIFFE JAMES BRAILSFORD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
RADCLIFFE JAMES BRAILSFORD, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
644 So. 2d 143
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1994)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Radcliffe James Brailsford was convicted of armed burglary and armed robbery and received consecutive sentences as a habitual offender. We affirm his convictions but reverse his sentences. On rémand, the trial court shall impose concurrent habitual offender sentences because both offenses arose out of a single criminal episode. See Hale v. State, 630 So. 2d 521 (Fla.1993).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and BLUE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Chapman v. State, 733 So. 2d 1055 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999)…she pleaded and any other property taken from the storage shed that is determined to have been in her actual or constructive possession as this property would be covered by the “other items” designation used in those two counts. See Milton v. State, 644 So. 2d 143 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994) (where defendant pleaded to information charging him with grand theft of three nail guns which were taken in a burglary, but was not charged with or otherwise associated with burglary, he was only liable for restitution for the na…1 / 2
-
M.P. v. State, 66 So. 3d 1055 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)…; see also State v. Williams, 520 So. 2d 276, 277-78 (Fla.1988) (holding that defendant was not required to pay restitution to the victim where damages to the victim were not caused by defendant’s leaving the scene of the accident); Milton v. State, 644 So. 2d 143, 144 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994) (holding that defendant convicted of theft but who was not associated with burglary could not be required to make restitution for any items not included in the information); Faulkner v. State, 582 So. 2d 783, 784 (Fla. 5th DC…
Authorities Cited
- Hale v. State, 630 So. 2d 521 (Fla. 1993)