DAVID LORENZO BROOKS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1994-10-24
No. 94-1127
ZEHMER, C.J., and BOOTH and DAVIS, JJ., concur.
644 So. 2d 149 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1994)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal from the trial court’s summary denial of appellant Brooks’ 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. Because the trial court failed to include attachments to its order conclusively showing that Brooks is entitled to no relief under rule 3.850(d), we must reverse and remand for the trial court to either conduct an evidentiary hearing or include the appropriate attachments supporting denial. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g); Hall v. State, 603 So. 2d 650 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Wells v. State, 598 So. 2d 259 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Cherry v. State, 590 So. 2d 494 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ZEHMER, C.J., and BOOTH and DAVIS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw