F.B., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Holmes v. State, 658 So. 2d 1185 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)
  …so egregious as to be the equivalent of fundamental error or are illegal. Larson v. State, 572 So. 2d 1368, 1370-71 (Fla.1991); Devine v. State, 636 So. 2d 179 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Watson v. State, 641 So. 2d 432 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Sweet v. State, 644 So. 2d 176 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). The prosecution costs and public defender fees imposed as conditions of probation in this case are neither illegal nor so egregious as to amount to fundamental error, and are therefore, affirmed. We strike the imposition of $1…
• Justice v. State, 658 So. 2d 1028 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)
  …ssue with the statement that the addition of unannounced conditions of probation is not a major source of appeals. It is and has been for several years. A few recent examples are: Willis v. State, 640 So. 2d 1188 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Sweet v. State, 644 So. 2d 176 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Jamail v. State, 637 So. 2d 362 [*1032] (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Peterson v. State, 645 So. 2d 84 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Chicone v. State, 644 So. 2d 532 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994), review denied, 651 So. 2d 1192 (Fla.1995); Nank v. State, 64…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Mantz v. State, 651 So. 2d 1320 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)
  …THOMPSON, Judge. In this Anders appeal,1 the special condition of probation directing payment to First Step of Volusia County, Inc. is hereby stricken. See Johnson v. State, 648 So. 2d 263 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Sweet v. State, 644 So. 2d 176 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). In all other respects, appellant’s judgment and sentencing disposition are affirmed. UNAUTHORIZED COSTS STRICKEN; JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF PROBATION AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED. DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ., concur. . See Anders v. Califo…

Authorities Cited

• R.J.A. v. Foster, 603 So. 2d 1167 (Fla. 1992)
• Wooden v. State, 601 So. 2d 283 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)
• B.V. v. State, 624 So. 2d 386 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993)
• Foster v. State, 624 So. 2d 386 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993)