CEDELL HENDERSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1994-10-06
No. 92-3685
ERVIN, BARFIELD, and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.
644 So. 2d 329 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1994) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Cedell Henderson challenges his convictions of possession of cannabis with intent to sell or deliver and possession of drug paraphernalia and the sentences imposed. Henderson correctly asserts that he was convicted on only one count of possession of cannabis with intent to sell. The written judgment and sentence incorrectly reflect two counts of possession with intent to sell. Henderson also correctly asserts that the written sentence for possession of drug paraphernalia, a first degree misdemeanor, inaccurately indicates that he was sentenced as an habitual offender on this count. We remand with directions to correct the written judgment and sentence. In all other respects, the convictions and sentences are affirmed.

ERVIN, BARFIELD, and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • State v. M.C., 666 So. 2d 877 (Fla. 1995)
    …GRIMES, Chief Justice. We have for review the following question certified to be of great public importance: MAY FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.800(b) BE APPLIED IN JUVENILE PROCEEDINGS? M.C. v. State, 644 So. 2d 329, 330 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. M.C. and E.C., juveniles, pled guilty to trespass of a motor home which they set on fire and destroyed. The motor home was uninsured and the loss suffered by the owner wa…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw