CHARLES JIMERSON, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Kersh v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 686 So. 2d 782 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)
  …tempt, or a hearing, we quash the order appealed. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.840; Pugliese v. Pugliese, 347 So. 2d 422, 425 (Fla.1977) (greater procedural [*783] process safeguards are to be imposed for indirect criminal contempt proceedings); Pryor v. Wille, 644 So. 2d 346 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994) (order for indirect criminal contempt quashed when trial court failed to comply with rule 3.840); Russ v. State, 622 So. 2d 501 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993) (order finding defendant guilty of indirect criminal contempt reversed because th…
• W.C. v. Smith, 898 So. 2d 1137 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)
  …minal penalties); Kersh v. State Fam Fire & Cas. Co., 686 So. 2d 782 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (finding that defendant must be afforded notice of the charge, the specifics as to what conduct constituted the alleged contempt, and a hearing); Pryor v. Wille, 644 So. 2d 346 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994) (quashing an order for indirect criminal contempt when the trial court failed to comply with the procedural rule); Benarroch v. Crawford, 516 So. 2d 28, 29 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987) (holding that the defendant was denied due process bec…
• J.M.P.U. v. The State of Fla. & Dep't of Child. & Fam. Servs., 858 So. 2d 389 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)
  …to due process protections); Kersh v. State Farm, Fire & Cas. Co., 686 So. 2d 782 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (defendant must be afforded notice of the charge, the specifics as to what conduct constituted the alleged contempt, and a hearing); Pryor v. Wille, 644 So. 2d 346 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994) (order for indirect criminal contempt quashed when trial court failed to comply with rule 3.840); Benarroch v. Crawford, 516 So. 2d 28, 29 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987) (“[T]he petitioner was denied procedural due process in this case becau…