ALSONSO DUHART, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ALSONSO DUHART, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
644 So. 2d 351
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1994)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See §§ 90.401-103, Fla.Stat. (1993); Averill v. State, 463 So. 2d 272 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Groves v. State, 668 So. 2d 1089 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)…ions of “affirmative misrepresentations” by trial counsel, the trial court should attach portions of the record that conclusively show that the appellant is entitled to no relief. Hayes v. State, 665 So. 2d 353 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Griffin v. State, 644 So. 2d 351 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Jones v. State, 636 So. 2d 604 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Carmichael v. State, 631 So. 2d 346 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Corbitt v. State, 584 So. 2d 231 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991). AFFIRMED. ERVIN, MICKLE and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.…
-
Rodriguez v. State, 645 So. 2d 1124 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)…new he was looking at substantial prison time upon a violation, a sentence in excess of twenty-seven years State Prison.” The record fails to refute Rodriguez’ claim. On remand, the trial court must conduct an eviden-tiary hearing. Griffin v. State, 644 So. 2d 351 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). We affirm the order revoking probation as modified. We strike the portion of the order finding that Rodriguez failed to submit timely for a drug test.…
Authorities Cited
- Averill v. State, 463 So. 2d 272 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)