JOHN STEWART SIMPSON, ETC., ET AL., APPELLANTS,

v.

ERNEST PARSONS AND PAMELA PARSONS, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• L.A.T. v. State, 650 So. 2d 214 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)
  …rest or otherwise to breach the peace.3 A “fighting words” finding is therefore constitutionally unjustified as a matter of law. See Morris v. State, 335 So. 2d 1 (Fla.1976); Gonzalez v. City of Belle Glade, 287 So. 2d 669 (Fla.1973); C.P. v. State, 644 So. 2d 600 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Harbin v. State, 358 So. 2d 856, 857 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); Ware v. City & County of Denver, 182 Colo. at 177, 511 P. 2d at 475; People v. Douglas, 29 Ill.App.3d 738, 742, 331 N.E. 2d 359, 363 (1975) (no finding of breach of peace…
• C.L.B. v. State, 689 So. 2d 1171 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997)
  …anger of bodily harm to others. We construe the statute so that no words except “fighting words” or words like shouts of “fire” in a crowded theater fall within its proscription. State v. Saunders, 389 So. 2d 641, 644 (Fla.1976). In C.P. v. State, 644 So. 2d 600 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994), this court concluded that the evidence was insufficient to support a disorderly conduct conviction because the defendant’s language (“fuck you, pussy cracker”) did not constitute fighting words, and there was no evidence that the…
• K.S. v. State, 697 So. 2d 1275 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)
  …te breach of the peace.” State v. Saunders, 339 So. 2d 641, 643 (Fla.1976)(in-temal quotations and citations omitted); see also Miller v. State, 667 So. 2d 325, 328 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); D.G. v. State, 661 So. 2d 75 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); C.P. v. State, 644 So. 2d 600 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). Compare C.L.B. v. State, 689 So. 2d 1171 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997)(dis-tinguishing L.A.T. and affirming adjudication where nonverbal acts combined with speech). Consequently, we reverse the orders finding K.S. guilty of disorderly cond…