DOROTHY WARE, APPELLANT,
v.
WALT DISNEY WORLD COMPANY AND FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, APPELLEES
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Dorothy Ware, challenges the order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission (UAC) that denied her unemployment benefits. The issue she raises on appeal is whether it was error to deny her claim for unemployment benefits without an evidentiary hearing when she alleged nondelivery of the disqualifying notice.
Appellee, UAC, confesses error and agrees that appellant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing and decision on the merits of her claim based upon lack of adequate notice to her proper address of the dismissal of her claim.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (13 total)
-
Thomas v. State, 711 So. 2d 96 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)…e revocation. We therefore affirm the revocation but remand for the written order. Mitchell v. State, 681 So. 2d 891 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). STONE, C.J., and GROSS, J„ concur. . Durden v. State, 577 So. 2d 640 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Vezina v. State, 644 So. 2d 602 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Purvis v. State, 420 So. 2d 389 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).…
-
Matthews v. State, 736 So. 2d 72 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)…rt agreed with the defendant, concluding the condition was “invalid” because it did not take into consideration the possibility that the defendant would not be able to obtain employment because of economic conditions, and relying on Vezina v. State, 644 So. 2d 602 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994), held that revocation based on this condition was improper because “[a]n invalid condition of probation may not form a basis to revoke probation.” Id. at 636. While Mathis does not state a principle of law which expressly confli…
-
Smith v. State, 705 So. 2d 1033 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)…(Fla. 1st DCA 1992). We, therefore, vacate Smith’s sentence. On remand, the trial court may impose the same sentence or exercise its discretion to impose a reduced sentence. See Royster v. State, 691 So. 2d 1196 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); Vezina v. State, 644 So. 2d 602 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). Accordingly, we affirm the order in part, reverse in part, and vacate the sentence. We remand the cause for correction of the revocation order and reconsideration of the sentence. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and caus…
Previewing 3 of 13 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence