ANDREW SCOTT JOHNSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1994-11-18
No. 94-1157
WOLF, WEBSTER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.
644 So. 2d 1034 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1994)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We conclude that appellant’s challenge to the amount of restitution he was ordered to pay as a condition of probation is properly before us. E.g., J.M.G. v. State, 629 So. 2d 1081 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); L.A.D. v. State, 616 So. 2d 106 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). We conclude, further, that the evidence will not support an award of restitution in an amount exceeding $1,500.00. Accordingly, the order of restitution is reversed, and the case is remanded with directions to enter an amended order establishing restitution in the amount of $1,500.00.

REVERSED and REMANDED, with directions.

WOLF, WEBSTER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw