JOHN A. SALATINO, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JOHN A. SALATINO, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
644 So. 2d 1035
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1994)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Appellant seeks reversal of his conviction and sentence for aggravated stalking. Appellant argues that section 784.048, Florida Statutes (Supp.1992), is vague and overbroad and is, therefore, unconstitutional. We rejected substantially similar arguments in Varney v. State, 638 So. 2d 1063 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) (citing Pallas v. State, 636 So. 2d 1358 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)), and Gilbert v. State, 639 So. 2d 191 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). Accordingly, we affirm on this issue, and, as we did in Varney and Gilbert, certify as being of great public importance, the following question:
IS SECTION 784.048, FLORIDA STATUTES (SUPP.1992), FACIALLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL AS VAGUE AND OVERBROAD?
We affirm.
BOOTH, WOLF and MICKLE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Pallas v. State, 636 So. 2d 1358 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)
- Varney v. State, 638 So. 2d 1063 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)
- Gilbert v. State, 639 So. 2d 191 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)
- Erick L. Bath v. State, 639 So. 2d 191 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)