ALPHONSO HOLMES, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1994-11-30
No. 94-0421
GLICKSTEIN, KLEIN and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.
645 So. 2d 600 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1994) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant contends and appellee concedes that the trial court erred in revoking appellant’s probation and in committing appellant indefinitely to the probation and restitution center. Accordingly, we reverse and remand with direction to determine if appellant has paid the balance of restitution owed, his discharge from probation being dependent upon his fulfilling that obligation.

GLICKSTEIN, KLEIN and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Nelson v. State, 669 So. 2d 1145 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)
    …oncedes, that the trial court erred in committing appellant to the probation restitution center for an indefinite period of time. Placement in a probation restitution center may not exceed 364 days. § 948.03(7)(c), Fla.Stat. (1993); Holmes v. State, 645 So. 2d 600 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). Appellant next contends, and the state again concedes, that the trial court erred in scoring the nolle prossed grand theft as an “additional offense.” Appellant received 1.2 points for the grand theft. As appellant points out,…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw