IN RE ADVISORY OPINION TO THE GOVERNOR
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
This case is an advisory opinion from the Florida Supreme Court responding to a question from the Governor regarding his constitutional duty to communicate the cause of suspension of certain appointed officers to the Senate. The Court clarified which types of appointed officers require such communication.
Yes, the Governor must communicate the cause of suspension to the Senate for officers appointed under the specified statutes, provided they exercise prescribed governmental functions and do not hold office solely "subject to the will of the Governor." For those appointed "subject to the will of the Governor," a fixed term is not contemplated, and thus suspension does not apply in the same manner.
“Are the officers or appointees named in the statutes above, which require no concurrence of the Senate to appoint, and no definite [*502] term apparently required, such as are contemplated within the meaning of the provision of the Constitution stated above requiring the cause of their suspension to be communicated to the Senate.”
This quote captures the central question posed by the Governor to the Court.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe Governor of Florida sought an advisory opinion on whether he was constitutionally required to inform the Senate of the causes for suspending certa…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
State of Florida, Executive Chamber, Tallahassee, November 29, 1918.
Hon.
Justices of the Supreme Court of Florida, Tallahassee, Fla. Gentlemen: Pursuant to Section 13 of Article IV of the Constitution of Florida, I have the honor to request your official opinion upon a question affecting my constitutional duties and powers involving the construction of Sections 14 and 15 of Article IV, and Section 7 of Article XVI of said Constitution respecting whether or not the cause of suspension should be communicated to the Senate of certain persons appointed under Section 9 of Chapter 5661, Laws of Florida, 1907, as amended by Section 9 of Chapter 6122, Laws of Florida, 1911, as amended by Section 9 of Chapter 6541, Laws of Florida, 1913, who were suspended by me for cause, since the adjournment of the Legislature of 1917; also certain other persons appointed under Chapter 5448, -lets of 1905, as amended by Section 13 of Chapter 6530, Laws of Florida, 1913, who were suspended by me, for cause, since the adjournment of the Legislature of 1917.
The question above being: Are the officers or appointees named in the statutes above, which require no concurrence of the Senate to appoint, and no definite term apparently required, such as are contemplated within the meaning of the provision of the Constitution stated above requiring the cause of their suspension to be communicated to the Senate.
Respectfully submitted, SIDNEY J.
CATTS, Governor. In the Supreme Court of Florida, Saturday, November 30, 1918.
To His Excellency Sidney J.
Oatts, Governor of Florida.
Sir: Replying to your inquiry of yesterday, you are advised that in our opinion the “food, drug and fertilizer inspectors for the Chemical Division of the Department of Agriculture of the State of Florida,” who are appointed by the Governor for terms not exceeding four years under Section 9 of Chapter 6541, Acts of 1913, and Section 9 of Chapter 6122, Acts of 1911, and whose statutory authority and duties involve the exercise of prescribed governmental functions, are officers, who, under Section 15 of Article IV of the Constitution, may be suspended from office by the Governor for stated causes; and when so suspended the stated section of the Constitution requires the Governor to communicate the cause of the suspension to the Senate at its next session after the suspension.
Sections 2 and 3 of Chapter 5448, Acts of 1905, are amended by Section 13 of Chapter 6530, Acts of 1913, only as to the number of “Supervisors of Convicts” that may be appointed, leaving the appointments of such “Supervisors of Convicts”- to be “subject to the will of the Governor” as provided in Sections 2 and 4 of Chapter 5448, Acts of 1905.
It is, therefore, our opinion that the “Supervisors of Convicts” who are appointed under Sec tion 3 of Chapter 5448, Acts of 1905, and Section113 of Chapter 6530, Acts of 1913, and who have governmental authority and duties prescribed by Sections 4163 and 4164, General Statutes, are officers; but as the statutes creating the offices expressly provide that “any supervisor appointed * * * shall hiold his appointment subject to the will of the Governor,” the rights of an appointee under such appointment may be terminated at the will of the Governor, and consequently a fixed term requiring a suspension from office of such an officer is not contemplated by the statute creating the office.
Yery respectfully, JEFFN. B.
BEOWNE, Chief Justice. E. F. TAYLOE, T. F. WEST, J. B.
WHITFIELD, Justices Supreme Court.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
The State of Fla. ex rel. v. Sheats, 78 Fla. 583 (Fla. 1919)…positions” of two Rural School Inspectors to be filled by Executive appointment does not create two offices; and unless offices are created there can be no officers. The holding in this case is not in conflict with Advisory Opinion to the Governor, 76 Fla. 500, 80 South. Rep. 17. The demurrer to the alternative writ is sustained. Browne, C. J., and Taylor, Ellis and' West, J. J., concur.…
-
Blitch v. Buchanan, 100 Fla. 1202 (Fla. 1930)…77, 22 So. R. 721, 63 A. S. R. 174; State v. Jones, 79 Fla. 56, 84 So. R. 84; McSween v. State Live Stock Sanitary Board, 97 Fla. 749, 122 So. R. 239; In Re Advisory Opinion to Governor, 49 Fla. 269, 39 So. R. 63; In Re Advisory Opinion to Governor, 76 Fla. 500, 80 So. R. 17; Dade County v. State, 95 Fla. 465, 116 So. R. 72; State v. Board of Public Instruction of Duval County, 98 Fla. 66, 123 So. R. 540. See also Westlake v. Merritt, 85 Fla. 28, 95 So. R. 662. There are exceptions to the above general rul…
-
State v. The Bd. of Pub. Instruction for the Cnty. of Duval, 98 Fla. 66 (Fla. 1929)…, ’ ’ and to fix their compensation to be paid from the county school fund. The enactment also proposes to confer upon such attendance officers powers and duties that may be exercised' or performed only by officers. See Advisory Opinion to Governor, 76 Fla. 500, 80 So. R. 17. These provisions of the statute conflict with Section 27, Article III, of the Constitution which commands that “the legislature shall provide for the election by the people or appointment by the Governor of all State and county office…