MICHAEL ANTHONY STOCKER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Single Criminal Episode cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Michael Anthony Stocker, appeals the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 and his motion for correction of illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. We hold that appellant’s rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief was appropriate for summary denial. In appellant’s rule 3.800 motion, appellant asserts that the trial court erred in imposing consecutive habitual offender sentences for offenses arising out of a single criminal episode. Because a factual determination is necessary on the single criminal episode issue, we affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s rule 3.800 motion without prejudice to appellant’s right to file a timely sworn motion for post-' conviction relief on the same ground pursuant to rule 3.850. See Callaway v. State, 642 So. 2d 636 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994) (wherein the second district held that the two-year time limit for filing such a motion begins to run upon Hale v. State, 630 So. 2d 521 (Fla.1993), becoming final); see also Bass v. State, 530 So. 2d 282 (Fla.1988).
AFFIRMED.
ALLEN, WEBSTER, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (13 total)
-
State v. Rivera, 719 So. 2d 335 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)…ends that by presenting conflicting evidence on this issue the state rebutted Rivera’s pri-ma facie case of self-defense. We disagree. A motion for judgment of acquittal pertains to the legal sufficiency of the state’s evidence. See State v. Smyly, 646 So. 2d 238, 241 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). If the trial evidence taken in a light most favorable to the state does not support a conviction, the motion must be granted. See id. On the other hand, if the state establishes the existence of each element of the crime ch…
-
State v. Rosalvo Lalor, Jr., 842 So. 2d 217 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)…states: “The verdict is contrary to the weight of the evidence. Therefore, a Judgment of Acquittal Notwithstanding the Verdict is granted.” This case is controlled by Tibbs v. State, 397 So. 2d 1120 (Fla.1981), which was applied in State v. Smyly, 646 So. 2d 238 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). In Smyly, the defendant had an alibi, the victim did not think the defendant’s hair was like that of the person who snatched her purse, and an eyewitness identification of the defendant was compromised because the defendant did…
-
State v. Coffman, 746 So. 2d 471 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998)
Previewing 3 of 13 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Hale v. State, 630 So. 2d 521 (Fla. 1993)
- Callaway v. State, 642 So. 2d 636 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994)
- Bass v. State, 530 So. 2d 282 (Fla. 1988)