SUPERIOR BRANDS, INC., A FOREIGN CORPORATION, BOBBY CARRAWAY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS AN EMPLOYEE OF SUPERIOR BRANDS, INC., AND CARNATION COMPANY, SUCCESSOR FOREIGN CORPORATION TO SUPERIOR BRANDS, INC., APPELLANTS,
v.
MARY ANN ROGERS & ROY REESE, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that section 440.205, Florida Statutes, does not allow for individual employee liability in a wrongful discharge action, and thus the trial court erred in denying the motion to dismiss that party.
[1] A statutory cause of action for wrongful discharge exists in Florida, replacing a common-law tort for retaliatory discharge.
[2] Statutes in derogation of the common law must be construed narrowly.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAppellants claimed an employee of Superior Brands could not be individually liable under section 440.205, Florida Statutes. The trial court denied the…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Statutory Cause Of Action cases and more on FLexlaw
ERVIN, Judge.
We affirm all issues except that wherein appellants claim that Bobby Carra-way, an employee of Superior Brands, could not be individually liable under section 440.205, Florida Statutes (1989), and as to this issue we reverse the trial court’s denial of appellants’ motion to dismiss,1 and remand with directions that Carraway be dismissed as a party.
As the supreme court explained in Scott v. Otis Elevator Co., 572 So. 2d 902, 903 (Fla.1990), Florida does not recognize a common-law tort for retaliatory discharge; instead, the legislature created section 440.205 to allow a statutory cause of action for wrongful discharge. A statute in derogation of the common law must be construed narrowly. Carlile v. Game & Fresh Water Fish Comm’n, 354 So. 2d 362 (Fla.1977); Jenks v. State, 582 So. 2d 676 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 589 So. 2d 292 (Fla.1991). Section 440.205 merely provides:
No employer shall discharge, threaten to discharge, intimidate, or coerce any employee by reason of such employee’s valid claim for compensation or attempt to claim compensation under the Workers’ Compensation Law.
(Emphasis added.) This provision cannot be read to authorize suit against an employee in his or her individual capacity. Cf. § 768.28(9)(a) (Fla.Stat.1989); District Sch. Bd. of Lake County v. Talmadge, 381 So. 2d 698, 703 (Fla.1980).
AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
JOANOS and BARFIELD, JJ., concur. . Appellants did not make any argument on appeal to support their assertion that the trial court's failure to grant Carraway's motion to dismiss on this ground warranted a new trial. We reach the issue only because the trial court had no jurisdiction to enter a judgment against a person who cannot be sued under the statute, and this court may consider such issue even if not properly framed in the briefs. Casey v. Smith, 134 So. 2d 846 (Fla. 2d DCA 1961); Florio v. State ex rel. Epperson, 119 So. 2d 305 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bruner v. GC-GW, Inc., 880 So. 2d 1244 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)…guous, courts may then resort to the rules of statutory construction. BellSouth Telecomms., Inc. v. Meeks, 863 So. 2d 287, 289 (Fla.2003). A statute that is in derogation of the common law must be construed narrowly. Superior Brands, Inc. v. Rogers, 646 So. 2d 257, 258 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). However, remedial statutes should be liberally construed in favor of granting access to the remedy provided by the Legislature. Golf Channel v. Jenkins, 752 So. 2d 561, 565-66 (Fla. 2000) (holding that any ambiguities in [*…
Authorities Cited
- Carlile v. Game & Fresh Water Fish Comm'n of the State of Fla., 354 So. 2d 362 (Fla. 1977)
- Florio v. State of Fla. ex rel. A. L. Epperson, 119 So. 2d 305 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960)
- Dist. Sch. Bd. OF Lake Cnty. v. Talmadge, 381 So. 2d 698 (Fla. 1980)
- Scott v. Otis Elevator Co., 572 So. 2d 902 (Fla. 1990)
- Jenks v. State, 582 So. 2d 676 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)
- Casey v. Archar B. Smith, 134 So. 2d 846 (Fla. 2d DCA 1961)