DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT ON BEHALF OF LOU ANN HAWES, APPELLANT,
v.
CHARLES W. SCHOLL, APPELLEE
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT ON BEHALF OF LOU ANN HAWES, APPELLANT,
CHARLES W. SCHOLL, APPELLEE
646 So. 2d 303
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1994)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Based on our review of the record and the appellee’s admission that the child support arrearage found by the trial court is erroneous, we reverse that portion of the order of modification setting the arrearage at $1,133.82 and remand for entry of a corrected order setting the arrearage at $1,878.23.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED.
COBB, DIAMANTIS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Pulles v. State, 650 So. 2d 1141 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)…nd the court may impose a departure sentence as long as proper contemporaneous written reasons are provided.” See State v. Betancourt, 552 So. 2d 1107, 1108 (Fla.1989); Hicks v. State, 640 So. 2d 1221, 1222 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).” Richardson v. State, 646 So. 2d 303, 303 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) (footnote omitted). The order under review is reversed and the cause remanded for resentencing.…