GRACE MILLINE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 1994-12-22
No. 94-226
HARRIS, C.J., and W. SHARP and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.
646 So. 2d 305 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1994) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s conviction is affirmed. Bouters v. State, 634 So. 2d 246 (Fla. 5th DCA), review granted, 640 So. 2d 1106 (Fla.1994). We find no error in the sentence.

AFFIRMED.

HARRIS, C.J., and W. SHARP and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • McMONAGLE v. State, 696 So. 2d 830 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997)
    …sentenced him to thirty months in prison. The court also ordered MeMonagle to pay $628.00 as restitution for the theft. Restitution is properly awarded for damages related to the crime for which a defendant is being sentenced. See Bowen v. State, 646 So. 2d 305 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Ochoa v. State, 596 So. 2d 515 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). In this case the restitution that was ordered to be paid was not related to the 1992 charge for which MeMonagle was being sentenced upon revocation of probation. Therefore, the…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw