HAMILTON'S BAR & GRILL, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
BAY BANK & TRUST COMPANY, JOHN CHRISTO, JR., EUGENE CLEMENT AND STEVE STEVENS, APPELLEES

Fla. 1st DCA | 1994-12-23
No. 94-267
JOANOS and MINER, JJ., concur.
646 So. 2d 847 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1994) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
ERVIN, Judge.

ERVIN, Judge.

This is an appeal from a final order dismissing a complaint with prejudice. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand. As to the two counts of the complaint alleging fraud, the trial court was required to take the plaintiffs allegation in its complaint as true that it did not know its equity had been fraudulently calculated until 1992. See Anderson v. Emro Mktg. Co., 550 So. 2d 531 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). Therefore, whether plaintiff could have discovered the facts that gave rise to counts II and III with the exercise of due diligence remains an issue of fact.

Dismissal of count I alleging breach of oral agreement is AFFIRMED, dismissal of counts II and III is REVERSED, and the ease is REMANDED for further proceedings.

JOANOS and MINER, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Williams v. State, 695 So. 2d 731 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)
    …45, and remand for preparation of a correct scoresheet prior to resentencing. The trial court is directed also to enter a written community control revocation order reciting the findings and specific violations orally pronounced. Southwell v. State, 646 So. 2d 847 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) (despite acceptable oral findings, trial court must enter written revocation order reciting specific violations). We do not disturb the appellant’s sentence in Circuit Court Case No. 95-361. AFFIRMING the judgment, VACATING the…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw