JOHN PEAK, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse No Contest Plea cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, John Peak, Jr., challenges the judgments and sentences of the trial court. He argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to withdraw his pleas of no contest that he filed pro se prior to sentencing. We affirm because Mr. Peak has not shown that the trial court abused its discretion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.170(f). Williams v. State, 316 So. 2d 267, 273 n. 6 (Fla.1975). Our affirmance, however, is without prejudice to Mr. Peak filing a motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 “demonstrating that a manifest injustice occurred because the trial court failed to establish a factual basis for his pleas.” Yarish v. State, 420 So. 2d 649 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982).
Affirmed.
RYDER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gerald v. State, 132 So. 3d 891 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014)…situation where finding Appellant guilty of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon cannot be reconciled with a specific finding that he did not possess a firearm, the only weapon alleged to be involved in the assault. See also Cunningham v. State, 647 So. 2d 164 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) (holding that jury’s failure to find the defendant guilty of possession of marijuana could not [*896] be reconciled with a verdict of guilty of possession of marijuana with intent to purchase). Accordingly, we reverse the trial…
Authorities Cited
- Williams v. State, 316 So. 2d 267 (Fla. 1975)
- Bloch v. Whitfield Zoning Dist., 420 So. 2d 649 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982)