FOREST PARK CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. OF DUNEDIN, A FLORIDA CORPORATION NOT FOR PROFIT, PETITIONER,
v.
RICHARD W. WIDERA AND MARLENE E. WIDERA, HIS WIFE, RESPONDENTS

Fla. 2d DCA | 1994-10-14
No. 94-01978
FRANK, C.J., and RYDER and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.
647 So. 2d 225 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1994) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We deny the petition for writ of certiorari but certify the same question certified as one of great public importance in Haines City Community Development v. Heggs, 647 So. 2d 855 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994):

AFTER EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC. V. CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, 541 SO.2D 106 (FLA. 1989), DOES THE STANDARD OF REVIEW IN COMBS V. STATE, 436 SO.2D 93 (FLA.1983), STILL GOVERN A DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL WHEN IT REVIEWS, PURSUANT TO FLORIDA RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 9.030(b)(2)(B), AN ORDER OF A CIRCUIT COURT ACTING IN ITS REVIEW CAPACITY OVER A COUNTY COURT?

FRANK, C.J., and RYDER and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Forest Park Condo. Ass'n v. Widera, 659 So. 2d 269 (Fla. 1995)
    …PER CURIAM. We have for review Forest Park Condominium Ass’n, Inc. of Dunedin v. Widera, 647 So. 2d 225 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994), which certified the following question to be of great public importance: AFTER EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC v. CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, 541 So. 2d 106 (Fla.1989), DOES THE STANDARD OF REVIEW IN COMBS v. STATE, 436 So. 2d 9…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw