ROBERT LEE WATSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ROBERT LEE WATSON, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
647 So. 2d 245
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1994)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 18 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
In this Anders appeal, we find merit only in appellant’s argument that the imposition of $2.00 in costs was improper because appellant was not given notice and an opportunity to be heard. We agree and order those $2.00 costs stricken. See Williams v. State, 601 So. 2d 1277 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). We otherwise affirm.
FRANK, C.J., and CAMPBELL and BLUE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Abel Oliveros Reyes v. State, 655 So. 2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)…horize a local government, not a court, to assess a cost. Because the statute is permissive, does not mandate action by the court, and is dependent upon the locality of the offense, this item must be treated as a discretionary cost. Watson v. State, 647 So. 2d 245 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). • § 775.0835(1) Fla.Stat. (1991). This fine is deposited into the Crimes Compensation Trust Fund. It is dependent upon the defendant’s ability to pay and other factors and cannot exceed $10,000. Whether regarded as a true fine…
-
Dep't of Banking & Fin. v. Osborne Stern & Co., 670 So. 2d 932 (Fla. 1996)…ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 517 REGULATING THE SALE OF SECURITIES, IS THE DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND FINANCE REQUIRED TO PROVE SUCH ALLEGATIONS BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE? Osborne Stern & Co. v. Department of Banking and Fin., 647 So. 2d 245 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. Respondents appealed from an order of the Department of Banking and Finance (the Department) requiring respondents to cease and desist their violations of securities laws, im…
-
S. Fla. Water Mgmt. Dist. v. RLI Live OAK, LLC, 139 So. 3d 869 (Fla. 2014)…to disputes over the granting of a license as it is to the revocation or suspension of a license,” and the imposition of administrative fines is subject to the clear and convincing evidence standard. Osborne Stern & Co. v. Dep’t of Banking and Fin., 647 So. 2d 245, 249 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). However, the First District also certified the following question to this Court: IN DENYING AN APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION TO SELL SECURITIES AND IMPOSING CIVIL FINES FOR ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 517 RE…
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Williams v. State, 601 So. 2d 1277 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)