RUSSELL WAYNE HOLLOWAY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the habitual offender statute does not apply to a defendant who committed the felony while already serving a prison sentence for a prior felony, if more than five years have passed since release from that prior sentence.
Russell Wayne Holloway was convicted of possession of contraband in prison while serving a 45-year sentence. He was sentenced as a habitual offender. …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Habitual Offender Sentencing cases and more on FLexlaw
BLUE, Judge.
Russell Wayne Holloway appeals his conviction and the habitual offender sentence imposed for possession of contraband in prison. He argues that his sentence was erroneous because the habitual offender statute does not apply to him, citing Jeffries v. State, 610 So. 2d 440 (Fla.1992). We agree.
On December 8, 1982, Holloway was sentenced to a 45-year prison sentence. While serving this sentence, he was charged and convicted of the instant offense. Section 775.084(l)(a)2, Florida Statutes (1991), provides that the court may impose a habitual felony offender sentence if
[t]he felony for which the defendant is to be sentenced was committed within 5 years of the date of the conviction of the last prior felony or other qualified offense of which he was convicted, or within 5 years of the defendant’s release, on parole or otherwise, from a prison sentence or other commitment imposed as a result of a prior conviction for a felony or other qualified offense, whichever is later. In Jeffries, the Florida Supreme Court held that this provision does not authorize a habitual felony offender sentence for a defendant who had been in prison for more than five years when the new offense occurred. Holloway’s situation fits within Jeffries, and therefore, he did not qualify for a habitual offender sentence.
Accordingly, we affirm Holloway’s conviction, reverse his habitual offender sentence and remand for resentencing within the guidelines.
DANAHY, A.C.J., and FULMER, J., concur.