MILDRED N. KOGER, APPELLANT,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BOARD OF CLINICAL SOCIAL WORK, MARRIAGE FAMILY THERAPY AND MENTAL HEALTH COUNSELING, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 1994-12-16
No. 94-0396
COBB, GRIFFIN and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.
647 So. 2d 312 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1994)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Dr. Mildred Koger appealed the Board's denial of her application for mental health counselor licensure by endorsement based on her failure to meet statutory coursework requirements. The Board interpreted section 491.005(4) to require that applicants complete required courses as students, not merely teach them, and the court affirmed this interpretation while noting the potential for unjust results and inviting legislative review.


Holding

The Board's interpretation that section 491.005(4) requires applicants to complete required courses as students, not as instructors, falls within the range of possible statutory interpretations and is not clearly erroneous, and therefore teaching experience does not substitute for the coursework requirement.


Headnotes

[1] An agency's construction of a statute it administers is entitled to great weight and will not be overturned unless clearly erroneous.

[2] An agency's interpretation of a statute need not be the sole possible interpretation; it need only be within the range of possible interpretations.

Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“An agency's construction of the statute it administers is entitled to great weight and is not to be overturned unless clearly erroneous.... [T]he agency's interpretation of a statute need not be the sole possible interpretation or even the most desirable one; it need only be within the range of possible interpretations.”

Establishes the deferential standard of review for agency statutory interpretation that governed the court's analysis

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Dr. Koger held an Ed.D. degree and had taught the required coursework for mental health counselor licensure at Jacksonville University and Troy State …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Mildred N. Roger, Ed.D., appeals the final order of the Board of Clinical Social Work, Marriage and Family Therapy, and Mental Health Counseling which denied her application for licensure by endorsement as a mental health counselor. The Board found that Dr. Roger had not met the coursework requirements of section 491.005(4), Florida Statutes (1991), despite the fact that Dr. Roger previously taught the required courses at Jacksonville University and Troy State University in Dothan, Aabama. In construing section 491.005(4), the Board concluded that an applicant for licensure must complete the courses prescribed in section 491.005(4) as a student, and that an applicant’s experi ence teaching the same courses does not satisfy the coursework requirements. We are constrained to affirm this interpretation of the statute, and we write briefly on this subject in order to bring this matter to the attention of the legislature.

As explained by the court in Board of Medical Examiners v. Durrani, 455 So. 2d 515 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984),

An agency’s construction of the statute it administers is entitled to great weight and is not to be overturned unless clearly erroneous.... [T]he agency’s interpretation of a statute need not be the sole possible interpretation or even the most desirable one; it need only be within the range of possible interpretations.

Durrani, 455 So. 2d at 517 (citations omitted). Under this standard, we cannot conclude that the Board’s interpretation of section 491.005(4) is clearly erroneous or fails to fall within the range of possible interpretations. The statute requires that an applicant complete a certain number of hours of graduate coursework at a fully accredited institution of higher education. The Board’s interpretation that section 491.005(4) does not authorize the substitution of teaching experience for the required hours of coursework, while perhaps not the most desirable, is certainly a possible interpretation of the statute.1

Because of the possibility that, as in the instant ease, unjust results may occur,2 the legislature may wish to address this matter. AFFIRMED.

COBB, GRIFFIN and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur. . We also agree with the Board’s conclusion that section 455.212, Florida Statutes (Supp.1992), does not authorize such substitution.

. The Board does not dispute that a student’s completion of the courses taught by Dr. Koger would meet the coursework requirements of section 491.005(4).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw