ANTHONY WHITEHURST, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1994-11-23
No. 94-03082
CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and LAZZARA and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
647 So. 2d 906 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1994)


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

[*907] PER CURIAM.

Anthony Whitehurst appeals the denial of a motion to correct illegal sentence and a sworn “motion to strike lien and public defender’s fees.” We affirm the denial of both motions.

The only claim that may have merit is the appellant’s assertion that he failed to receive prior notice and an opportunity to be heard regarding the public defender’s fees assessed against him. See Smith v. State, 623 So. 2d 1242 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Townsend v. State, 604 So. 2d 885 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). The trial court denied relief without ruling on the merits of this allegation. As in Smith, the trial court should have denied relief without prejudice to the. appellant filing a motion that satisfies all the requirements of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

Accordingly, we affirm without prejudice to the appellant filing a motion pursuant to rule 3.850.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and LAZZARA and QUINCE, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw