CHARLES HARRELL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
CHARLES HARRELL, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
647 So. 2d 966
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1994)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED on the authority of Watts v. State, 593 So. 2d 198 (Fla.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 112 S.Ct. 3006, 120 L.Ed.2d 881 (1992).
DELL, C.J., and STONE and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bryant v. State, 186 So. 3d 25 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016)…d that the results would be forthcoming. Bryant acknowledged receiving this supplemental discovery advising that the' results would be disclosed in the future. The State recommended a recess' or a mistrial-as a remedy. Relying on State v. Trummert, 647 So. 2d 966 (Fla. 4th-DCA 1994), the trial court found that there was no discovery violation; but that if there was a discovery violation, it was not willful, but was substantial' and there was procedural prejudice to Bryant based on the late disclosure. As to…
Authorities Cited
- Watts v. State, 593 So. 2d 198 (Fla. 1992)