JAMES B. MASSEY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JAMES B. MASSEY, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
648 So. 2d 785
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1994)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The summary denial of the defendant’s Rule 3.800(a) motion to correct an illegal sentence in which the defendant alleged illegal consecutive habitual offender sentences under Hale v. State, 630 So. 2d 521 (Fla.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 278,130 L.Ed.2d 195 (Fla.1994), is affirmed without prejudice for the defendant to seek relief in a properly filed Rule 3.850 motion. See Calla-way v. State, 642 So. 2d 636 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Borders v. State, 643 So. 2d 110 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).
DAUKSCH, COBB and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Edwards v. State, 652 So. 2d 852 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)…because they arose out of a single factual event, Hale v. State, 630 So. 2d 521 (Fla.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 278, 130 L.Ed.2d 195 (1994), the correct remedy to seek relief is a properly filed Rule 3.850 motion. See Massey v. State, 648 So. 2d 785 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Borders v. State, 643 So. 2d 110 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Callaway v. State, 642 So. 2d 636 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994) (question certified). HARRIS, C.J., and GRIFFIN, J., concur. . See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.800(a).…
-
Massey v. State, 660 So. 2d 760 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)…cause the same issue was raised in a prior Rule 3.800(a) motion and [*761] denied. However, this court affirmed the denial of the Rule 8.800(a) motion without prejudice to file a Rule 3.850 motion and did not rule on the merits. See Massey v. State, 648 So. 2d 785 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). Since the record clearly reflects that consecutive habitual felony offender sentences were imposed and the appellant’s allegation that the offenses involved arose from a single episode has not been refuted by any attachments to…
-
Dasher v. State, 657 So. 2d 1290 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)…received consecutive habitual sentences for two of his crimes because the two crimes were part of a single episode. Because such a claim is factually based, we affirm the denial without prejudice to his filing of a 3.850 motion. See Massey v. State, 648 So. 2d 785 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). See also Young v. State, 616 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Nowlin v. State, 639 So. 2d 1050 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). Dasher’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied. AFFIRMED. THOMPSON, J., concurs. GRIFFIN, J., dissent…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Hale v. State, 630 So. 2d 521 (Fla. 1993)
- Callaway v. State, 642 So. 2d 636 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994)
- Borders v. State, 643 So. 2d 110 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994)