J. R. CATHCART, APPELLANT,
v.
TOMMIE THOMPSON, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court dismissed an appeal from an order of a court commissioner granting an injunction, holding that appeals from court commissioners' orders must first be reviewed by the circuit judge before they can be appealed to the Supreme Court.
An appeal cannot be taken directly to the Supreme Court from a court commissioner's order. Court commissioners' orders must first be reviewed by the circuit judge, who may confirm, qualify, or vacate them, and only then may an appeal be taken from the circuit judge's decision as an order of the circuit court.
“The Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction in all cases at law and in equity originating in circuit courts.”
Establishes that Supreme Court jurisdiction is limited to cases originating in circuit courts, not from court commissioners
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceA court commissioner granted an injunction in a case between J. R. Cathcart and Tommie Thompson. Cathcart appealed directly to the Florida Supreme Cou…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Interlocutory Orders cases and more on FLexlaw
Whitfield, J.
— The appeal herein is from an order of a court commissioner granting an injunction. If this is not a decree or order from which an appeal may he taken to this court, the appeal must be dismissed, even though the cause has been submitted here on its merits.
The Constitution, 1885, contains the following provisions :
“A circuit judge may appoint in each county in his circuit one or more attorneys at law to be court commissioners, who shall have power in the absence from the county of the circuit judge, to allow writs of injunction, and to issue writs of habeas corpus, returnable before himself or the circuit judge. Their orders in such matters may be reviewed by the circuit judge, and confirmed, qualified or vacated. They may be removed by the circuit judge. The Legislature may confer upon them further powers, not judicial, and shall fix their compensation.” Sec. 14, Art. V.
“The Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction in all cases at law and in equity originating in circuit courts.” Sec. 5, Art. V.
The statutes contain the following provisions:
“The orders of court commissioners shall be of like force as if allowed by the judge and the same may, on motion, be confirmed, qualified, or set aside by the circuit judge, of which, motion such notice must be given as the judge may deem sufficient.” Sec. 2030, Gen. Stats. 1906, Compiled Laws, 1914.
“Appeals may be taken and prosecuted from any interlocutory order, decision, judgment or decree of the circuit courts of this State, when sitting as courts of equity.” Sec. 1908, Gen. Stats. 1906 Compiled Laws, 1914.
The effect of the above provisions is to make the action taken by court commissioners pursuant to the Constitution in allowing writs of injunction and issuing writs of habeas corpus and “their orders in such matters,” reviewable by the Circuit Judge who may confirm, qualify or vacate them. Where the orders are reviewed by the Circuit Judge, his decision thereon may be appealed from as decrees or orders “of the circuit courts.” By the statute “the orders of court commissioners shall be of like force as if allowed by the judge;” but this is for purposes of enforcement and has no reference to appeals to the Supreme Court, since appeals in chancery must be from the decrees and orders “of the circuit courts.”
The provisions' of law with reference to court commissioners are quite unlike those relating to Referees. See Secs. 19 and 20, Art. V, Constitution of 1885; Secs. 1659 et seq. Gen. Stats. 1906, Compiled Laws, 1914.
The appeal is dismissed. ’
All concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In re Adoption of Carol Palmer, 129 Fla. 630 (Fla. 1937)…any action by the Circuit Court as a Court. There are cases holding that where a judge acts as a judge and not as a court, his decision is not appealable; that an appeal only lies from a judicial tribunal. See in this connection Cathcart v Thompson, 77 Fla. 153, 81 So. 410. It appears that the adoption statute constitutes the Circuit Judge as special statutory judicial tribunal, but no appeal is provided for therein. It is generally held that in the absence of permissive statutory provision, no appeal wil…