DOMINGO BENITEZ, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
DOMINGO BENITEZ, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
648 So. 2d 862
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1995)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See O’Callaghan v. State, 429 So. 2d 691 (Fla.1983); McCray v. State, 416 So. 2d 804 (Fla.1982); Williams v. State, 567 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), review denied, 577 So. 2d 1331 (Fla.1991).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
C.M. and L.M. v. Dept. OF Children AND Families, 823 So. 2d 182 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)…of dependency. An adjudication of dependency must be based upon a finding of abuse, abandonment or neglect. W.T. v. Department of Children and Families, 787 So. 2d 184 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); Gelrod v. Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 648 So. 2d 862 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); § 39.01(14)(a), Fla. Stat. The state offers no alternative theory to support' the finding of dependency as to the father nor can we ascertain one from the record. Even the trial court found the child was dependent “by a mere sha…
Authorities Cited
- Ervin McCRAY v. State, 416 So. 2d 804 (Fla. 1982)
- O'Callaghan v. State, 429 So. 2d 691 (Fla. 1983)
- Williams v. State, 567 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990)