JEREMY SCHWARTZ, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1995-01-18
No. 93-02696
FRANK, C.J., and FULMER, J., concur.
648 So. 2d 1224 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1995)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court affirmed the convictions but remanded for certain costs to be stricken due to procedural errors in their imposition.


Facts & Procedural History

Appellant challenged convictions and sentences for possession and purchase of cannabis. The trial court imposed certain costs without proper notice or…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
THREADGILL, Judge.

[*1225] THREADGILL, Judge.

The appellant challenges his convictions and sentences for possession of cannabis and purchase of cannabis. We affirm the convictions without discussion, but remand for certain costs to be stricken.

We affirm the statutorily mandated costs of $250.00, which were properly imposed pursuant to sections 27.3455 and 960.20, Florida Statutes (1993). We strike, however, the remaining costs imposed. In Sutton v. State, 635 So. 2d 1032 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994), we held that costs of prosecution imposed pursuant to section 939.01, Florida Statutes must be proven by the state with consideration given to the defendant’s financial resources. We also held that discretionary costs, such as those for the court improvement fund and the drug education fund, cannot be imposed unless the defendant is given notice and an opportunity to be heard and the record recites the statutory authority for their imposition. 635 So. 2d at 1033. Those procedures were not followed here.

We therefore affirm the convictions, but strike the costs of prosecution and discretionary costs. On remand the state may seek to reimpose the stricken costs consistent with the requirements of Sutton.

FRANK, C.J., and FULMER, J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw