WILLIAM EUGENE BOLIN, APPELLANT,
v.
CATHERINE LANGHAM BOLIN, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1995-02-01
No. 93-3164
DELL, C.J., GUNTHER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.
648 So. 2d 1264 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1995)


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final judgment of dissolution of marriage in all respects except for the refusal of the trial court to consider the husband’s motion for modification of temporary relief.

Over 3 years prior to trial, and a few months after the entry of a temporary relief order, the husband moved to modify based on a substantial reduction of his income. Subsequently, the husband renewed his request for modification and again sought to have it heard at trial. The court’s refusal to consider this request was an error. Compagnoni v. Compagnoni, 619 So. 2d 450 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). We therefore reverse that portion of the judgment establishing the arrearage for reconsideration after the court hears the motion for modification.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

DELL, C.J., GUNTHER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw