VIRGINIA WOLFSON, APPELLANT,
v.
UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, ET AL., APPELLEES
W. SHARP, Judge.
Wolfson appeals from a final order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission, which affirmed the appeals referee’s ruling that she is not entitled to unemployment compensation benefits. The appellant has the burden in these cases to demonstrate error and where the thrust of the argument is fact findings made by the referee, the appellant’s failure to include a copy of the transcript, as part of the record on appeal, is fatal. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla.1979). The referee found that Wolfson left her employment in order to assist her daughter in Chicago, and not for “good cause attributable to his employing unit.”1 Accordingly we affirm.
AFFIRMED.
GOSHORN and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur. . § 443.101(l)(a), Fla.Stat. (1993).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (18 total)
-
Fryburg v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 799 So. 2d 281 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)…final order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission affirming the appeals referee’s ruling that she is not entitled to unemployment compensation benefits. We affirm. Fryburg has the burden to demonstrate error. Wolfson v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 649 So. 2d 363 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). Because the focus of Fryburg’s argument is the fact findings made by the referee, Fryburg’s failure to include a copy of the transcript of the hearing as part of the record on appeal is fatal. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallah…
-
Swain v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 842 So. 2d 160 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)…PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See R.H. v. Department of Children and Families, 724 So. 2d 1273 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999); Wolfson v. Unemployment Appeals Commission, 649 So. 2d 363 (Fla. 5 th DCA 1995). SHARP, W., SAWAYA and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.…
-
Benson v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 927 So. 2d 49 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)…was supported by competent, substantial evidence. This appeal followed. When a party appeals a final order of the UAC affirming the appeals referee’s ruling, the appellant has the burden to demonstrate error. Wolfson v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 649 So. 2d 363 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). The appeals referee is the trier of fact, responsible for weighing and resolving conflicting evidence and judging credibility. Ritenour v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 570 So. 2d 1106, 1107 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). The appeals refer…
Previewing 3 of 18 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Pitcher v. Schneider (Fla. 5th DCA 2018)
- Albert v. Applegate et ux., 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979)