ALBERTO CANGUSSO, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Holmes v. State, 658 So. 2d 1185 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)
  …ion which prohibited appellant from using intoxicants to excess. The state concedes that the condition of probation prohibiting appellant from using intoxicants to excess was not orally pronounced at trial and must be vacated. See Jaworski v. State, 650 So. 2d 172 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). Because there was no objection below, we affirm the imposition of the prosecution costs and public defender fees. Despite the lack of an objection, we reverse the costs payable to Indian River County because of the trial court’s…
• W.J. v. State, 688 So. 2d 954 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)
  …educational program.” The language of this condition is merely an explicit clarification of the extent to which the condition of school is imposed. The holding of A.B.C. does not require that this condition be orally imposed. See Jaworski v. State, 650 So. 2d 172 (Fla. 4th DCA1995). 4. Not possess any firearms or weapons. Although section 39.054 does not address firearms or weapons, section 790.23, Florida Statutes (1995), makes it unlawful for a person to possess any firearm or electric weapon or to carry…
• Carter v. State, 677 So. 2d 1349 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)
  …unlawfully sold was lawfully imposed. The portion of the condition barring Carter from visiting places where intoxicants and drugs are unlawfully sold is a lawfully imposed valid general condition in accordance with our opinion in Jaworski v. State, 650 So. 2d 172 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995) (condition of probation that defendant not visit places where controlled substances are unlawfully sold, dispensed or used was valid even though it was not announced in open court; condition was more explicit clarification of sta…

Authorities Cited

• Rosly Desouza v. State, 650 So. 2d 170 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)