JESSE WATERS, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1995-02-24
No. 94-104
BARFIELD, MINER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.
650 So. 2d 232 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1995) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment and sentence imposed following revocation of Appellant’s probation. Eanes v. State, 648 So. 2d 174 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) (on motion for certification); Bragg v. State, 644 So. 2d 586 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). We certify the following as a question of great public importance:

MUST A TRIAL COURT, UPON REVOCATION OF PROBATION FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF COMMUNITY CONTROL, CREDIT TIME PREVIOUSLY SERVED ON PROBATION AND COMMUNITY CONTROL TO ANY NEWLY IMPOSED TERM OF IMPRISONMENT AND PROBATION FOR THE SAME OFFENSE, SO THAT THE TOTAL PERIOD OF COMMUNITY CONTROL, PROBATION, AND IMPRISONMENT ALREADY SERVED AND TO BE SERVED DOES NOT EXCEED THE STATUTORY MAXIMUM FOR A SINGLE OFFENSE?

AFFIRMED.

BARFIELD, MINER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Waters v. State, 662 So. 2d 332 (Fla. 1995)
    …IMPOSED TERM OF IMPRISONMENT AND PROBATION FOR THE SAME OFFENSE, SO THAT THE TOTAL PERIOD OF COMMUNITY CONTROL, PROBATION, AND IMPRISONMENT ALREADY SERVED AND TO BE SERVED DOES NOT EXCEED THE STATUTORY MAXIMUM FOR A SINGLE OFFENSE? Waters v. State, 650 So. 2d 232 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. Consistent with our recent decisions in State v. Roundtree, 644 So. 2d 1358 (Fla.1994), and State v. Summers, 642 So. 2d 742 (Fla.1994), we answer the certified question in th…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw