DEAN WILLIAM MOORE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
DEAN WILLIAM MOORE, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
650 So. 2d 233
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1995)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The order revoking appellant’s probation does not set forth the specific conditions of probation which the appellant was found to have violated; therefore, the order is deficient. Cue v. State, 619 So. 2d 471 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). While it appears that there may be sufficient justification for revocation of appellant’s probation, the specific grounds are not certain as the order is written. The cause is remanded for the trial court to amend the written order to specify the grounds for violation.
ERVIN, JOANOS and WOLF, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Denty v. State, 731 So. 2d 789 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)…on v. State, 720 So. 2d 1104, 1105 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (noting “what may have been a crucial clerical error”). It is ultimately for the court, not the jailer, to ascertain “the amount of time ... served in jail prior to sentencing.” Walker v. State, 650 So. 2d 233, 233 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).…
Authorities Cited
- Sherrond Deangelo CUE v. State, 619 So. 2d 471 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)