JOSEPH THOMPSON, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that multiple punishments are impermissible for offenses arising from a single act if the offenses are distinguished only by degree elements.
Thompson was convicted of sexual battery on a physically incapacitated victim and sexual activity while in custodial authority of a child, based on a …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Multiple Punishments cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
We have for review Thompson v. State, 627 So. 2d 74 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993), which expressly and directly conflicts with the opinions in Sirmons v. State, 634 So. 2d 153 (Fla.1994), and Goodwin v. State, 634 So. 2d 157 (Fla.1994). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Based on a single sexual act, Thompson was convicted of sexual battery on a physically incapacitated victim in violation of section 794.011(4)(f), Florida Statutes (1991), and sexual activity while in custodial authority of a child, in violation of section 794.041(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1991). He was sentenced to two concurrent nine-year terms. The district court found no multiple-punishments problem in this sentencing scheme, but noted possible conflict with George v. State, 488 So. 2d 589 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). However, the district court proceeded to distinguish George from the instant case.
We do not address whether conflict with George exists, because we find independent conflict with Sirmons and Goodwin. In those two cases we held multiple punishments impermissible based on a single act if the various offenses are distinguished only by degree elements, which clearly is the case here. Accordingly, we find that the prohibition against multiple punishments has been violated. Art. I, § 9, Fla. Const. The decision below is quashed, and this cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with our views here and in Sirmons and Goodwin. Dual convictions and sentences are not permissible here.
It is so ordered.
GRIMES, C.J., OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN, HARDING and WELLS, JJ., and MeDONALD, Senior Justice, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (58 total)
-
Morrison v. State, 818 So. 2d 432 (Fla. 2002)…inted counsel is rendering effective assistance to the defendant. See Howell v. State, 707 So. 2d 674, 680 (Fla.1998). However, as a practical matter, the trial judge’s inquiry can only be as specific as the defendant’s complaint. See Lowe v. State, 650 So. 2d 969 (Fla.1994). This Court has consistently found a Nelson hearing unwarranted where a defendant presents general complaints about defense counsel’s trial strategy and no formal allegations of incompetence have been made. See Davis v. State, 703 So. 2d…
-
Sexton v. State, 775 So. 2d 923 (Fla. 2000)…ppointed counsel is rendering effective assistance to the defendant.” Howell v. State, 707 So. 2d 674, 680 (Fla.1998). As a practical matter, however, the trial judge’s inquiry can only be as specific as the defendant’s complaint. See Lowe v. State, 650 So. 2d 969, 975 (Fla.1994). This Court has consistently found a Nelson hearing unwarranted where a defendant presents general complaints about defense counsel’s trial strategy and no formal allegations of incompetence have been made. See Davis v. State, 703 So…
-
Harrel Franklin Braddy v. State, 111 So. 3d 810 (Fla. 2012)…arm across Braddy’s neck, but Smith also questioned Braddy about Quati-sha’s location. Smith’s actions were known, or at least should have been known, to be reasonably likely to evoke an incriminating response from Braddy. In fact, in Lowe v. State, 650 So. 2d 969, 973 (Fla.1994), this Court highlighted the comments of the United States Supreme Court in Arizona v. Mauro, 481 U.S. 520, 529-30, 107 S.Ct. 1931, 95 L.Ed.2d 458 (1987), that “[i]n deciding whether particular police conduct is interrogation [under I…
Previewing 3 of 58 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Sirmons v. State, 634 So. 2d 153 (Fla. 1994)
- Goodwin v. State, 634 So. 2d 157 (Fla. 1994)
- Godwin v. State, 488 So. 2d 589 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986)
- Thompson v. State, 627 So. 2d 74 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)
- Garcia v. State, 627 So. 2d 74 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993)