HARRY H. BROWN, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
HARRY H. BROWN, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
650 So. 2d 1130
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1995)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion for postconvietion relief filed pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850. The issues presented are procedurally barred from consideration, as they formed the basis for an earlier motion for postconviction relief.1 See La Marca v. State, 547 So. 2d 350 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).
Affirmed.
. Brown v. State, 643 So. 2d 1091 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Munson v. State, 654 So. 2d 1220 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)…r full sentencing hearing and denied the appellant’s motion for withdrawal of plea. [*1221] The state is correct that the appellant is procedurally barred from arguing the second issue. See Adams v. State, 484 So. 2d 1216 (Fla.1986); Brown v. State, 650 So. 2d 1130 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). Affirmed in part and reversed in part. ALTENBERND and FULMER, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- La Marca v. State, 547 So. 2d 350 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)