ELDON AUGUST DIMITROFF, LORRAINE CATHERINE DIMITROFF AND DAVID DIMITROFF, APPELLANTS,
v.
THE HONORABLE PETER J.T. TAYLOR, JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that parents seeking family administration of their son's intestate estate, where they are the sole heirs and would be personal representatives, are not required to be represented by an attorney.
The parents and brother of the decedent filed a petition for family administration of the decedent's intestate estate, alleging the estate was small a…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Interested Person cases and more on FLexlaw
QUINCE, Judge.
The Dimitroffs appeal the trial court’s denial of their petition for family administration of the estate of their deceased son/brother. The trial court denied the petition based on Florida Probate Rule 5.030(a), which requires the personal representative of most estates to be represented by an attorney. We reverse because attorney representation is not necessary under the circumstances of this case.
The parents and brother of the decedent filed an amended petition for family administration without a will. The petition alleged the decedent died intestate with a gross estate of $47,613. It was further alleged that the estate was not indebted, and that the parents are the sole heirs.
Rule 5.030(a) indicates the personal representative must be represented by an attorney unless the personal representative is the sole interested person or the personal representative is an attorney. In this instance the persons who would be the personal representatives are also the only interested persons.
Mark Kevin Dimitroff died intestate. He is survived by his parents and a brother. The parents are the heirs at law to this estate. See § 732.103(2), Fla.Stat. (1993). The parents would also have preference in appointment as the personal representatives. § 733.301(2)(e), Fla.Stat. (1993). The parents as personal representatives would also be the sole interested parties. Therefore, the parents need not be represented by an attorney.
The purpose of a family administration is to streamline the procedures necessary to administer an estate which is less than $60,000, the decedent died intestate, and the heirs at law are the spouse, lineal descendents or lineal ascendents. Requiring the parents to have an attorney represent them under the facts of this ease would defeat that purpose. We reverse the trial court’s denial of the petition for family administration and remand for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
PARKER, A.C.J., and BLUE, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Benedetto v. Columbia Park Healthcare Sys., 922 So. 2d 416 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)…istration itself and any independent proceedings prosecuted or defended by the estate. Thus, unless'Appellant is the “sole interested person,” as defined by law, he is precluded from maintaining this appeal without counsel. See, Dimitroff v. Taylor, 651 So. 2d 131 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). See also § 731.201(21), Fla. Stat. (2005) (defining “interested person”). Having now clarified our prior order, Appellant shall, within thirty (30) days of the date of this order, furnish to this court relevant portions of the p…